We all love to hate limited releases. Well, not limited releases per se, but what I really mean is we love to hate the frustrations that surround them. Whether it’s the crazy headlines such as the infamous “Pappy Van Winkle is so rare even billionaires can’t buy it,” the increasing MSRP on more and more bottles that may be no better than average, or the exorbitant prices charged by some retailers, limited releases have come to chronically frustrate long time bourbon enthusiasts.

 

In November 2016 we posted a survey polling readers for feedback on the problem, their background when it comes to bourbon and limited release experience, along with their ideas for potential solutions. We’ll keep the survey open in order to continue gathering data, but already there are some interesting results.

 

Survey Results

 

  • So far there have been 561 respondents.

 

  • The majority of respondents (95.5%) classified themselves as consumers.

My Thoughts on The Topic

 

What people are actually paying for limited releases is a central discussion point, as potential solutions largely hinge on supply chain issues. This contributes in large part to a consumer's experience by geographical location and situational perspective, which I believe plays a large role in opportunity and availability at MSRP. The variation of consumer experiences, and ultimately price combined with availability, cannot be understated here, as a consumer subject to a state controlled liquor board and a limited release lottery system will vary substantially from one in a rural state or one in a highly populated state with a larger allocation.

 

There are constant debates in the bourbon community over what end consumers are actually paying for limited releases, with some arguing most pay MSRP and others arguing most pay secondary prices, either via retailer channels or ultimately within the secondary market itself.

 

I’ve been unable to find enough publicly available data to fully support either side of the argument, so it’s fair to assume perception has played a large part of the argument for both sides. To complicate matters, highly inflated valuations receive a tremendous amount of attention, skewing perception in favor of the position that most transactions are taking place at secondary values. Unfortunately, some retailers believe this, which leads them to inflate prices under the assumption that if they don’t, they’re suckers and someone else will just capitalize on their good nature.

 

While the results of this survey represent only 561 readers, taking it as a cross-section of the overall consumer group strongly supports the position that most transactions for limited releases take place at or near MSRP. Further, the majority of respondents dislike the idea of raising MSRP as a solution. This backs the position that inflated retailer pricing along with secondary market cash for bottle transactions to end consumers represent only a small fraction of total sales to end consumers.

 

If you believe this, it’s critically important because it makes a strong case for the idea that raising prices is not a favorable solution. In fact, a case could be made supporting the idea that maintaining reasonable prices on limited releases, despite what the secondary market suggests, is a key to the bourbon industry’s continued success.

 

 

Consider the Following

 

The limited release problem may not be a problem at all. In fact, it might be one of the best things that could have happened to bourbon.

 

Before you take up your pitchforks and light your torches, hear me out on this.

 

The limited release “problem” is good because bourbon hunting can be a lot of fun, and can be credited as one of the key elements that draws people into bourbon in the first place.

 

If you ask me about my bourbon story, I’ll tell you about how my two close friends and co-creators of this website played a large role, our combined interest creating somewhat of a snowball effect. A key aspect of the effect was the hunt for limited releases. My first bottle of Buffalo Trace Antique Collection (we shared a bottle of Thomas H. Handy), my first Pappy 20 Year, my first George T. Stagg, that time we landed a Parker’s Heritage 27 Year...all of these created a feeling of excitement that fueled my interest in bourbon during a critical time when I could have decided to either take it or leave it.

 

The thrill of the hunt has worn off quite a bit since that time, but it played an immense role in piquing my interest as I transitioned from an occasional bourbon drinker to something more than that.

 

If these limited releases were always at our fingertips what fun would that be? Unaffordable for most? Where’s the thrill of the hunt? The excitement would wear off or never even ignite in the first place.

 

So the challenge facing producers is not necessarily how to make limited releases available for everyone, but how to keep them reasonably accessible for anyone, yet still special and limited.

 

Producers only have so much control, but they can take cues from the community and take advantage of the control they do have. They can participate in measures that would shift the industry regulations in the right direction. New releases hitting market at $350 or $500 will sell in today’s market, but they’re out of reach for many. That’s not even considering the increasing number of retailers asking well above MSRP. Certain bottles like Sazerac 18 Year released in counts of a few thousand, combined with the increased demand, have come so far out of reach it’s not even fun anymore and many consumers have just given up.

 

My point is, bourbon producers should simply do what they can to keep bourbon hunting fun and keep the idea of finding something special and affordable alive. The continued success of the industry might depend on it.

 

 

Featured Reader Comments

 

  • As a general comment, I think the secondary market is unfairly maligned in most of the discussions about this issue. Bourbon is hot right now, and most of it is not being bought to be resold on the infamous "secondary market." The old saying goes, "you're not in traffic . . . you are traffic." That's high end American whiskey right now. I see little evidence that more than a fraction of the thousands of bottles of Stagg and Pappy that are released every year are actually ending up on Facebook or Craigslist. I also think that Sazerac, specifically, is unfairly maligned for keeping their limited edition pricing at a non-exorbitant level. (Seriously: only in this hobby could we somehow manage to make a villain out of the company that is continuing to sell their best whiskey at a consumer-friendly price). -Mitch Park, Consumer

 

  • Lobby to have direct to consumer (via mail) sales declared legal across the country. Then people could sign up (in clubs or for one off releases) and producers would have a more accurate view of demand and things wouldn't be mis-allocated. Of course flippers could still exist but things wouldn't go to stores that mark it up or areas where it doesn't sell as well. Wine can do it, why can't we? -Dixon Milner, Consumer

 

  • Don't release a full batch of a Limited Edition all at once. Trickle it out throughout the year so there isn't a mad rush anchored to any particular release. Some individual distributors already do this but it's inconsistent. Better if it's controlled by the distilleries. -TWJ, Consumer & Unpaid Industry Contributor

 

  • Revise laws to allow for interstate shipping of small samples of alcoholic beverages to all states. In many cases I would rather buy a 50ml sample (e.g. Flaviar) but cannot do so because of state laws. This would allow me to get a taste of the hard to find bourbons or other spirits and then I would decide if I wanted to pursue hunting/purchasing a 750ml bottle(s). In many cases I would be satisfied just to have tasted the sample once and leave it to others buy the full size bottle(s). -Rick Bunch, Consumer

 

  • No one wants to wait a whole year for a bottle that they might miss out on AGAIN. Eventually, many will concede that the hunt just isn't worth the time and frustration, and that they could save themselves all the unpleasantness and heartache by just forking over the exorbitant amount of money for the bottle to a secondary reseller and be done with it. It happens...I'm certainly guilty of giving in. But what if, instead of "nope, you missed them, try again next year," the customer was told "we got one, and it already sold, but they send us bottles periodically throughout the year and you should just keep checking back”...? Suddenly that's not so bad; yeah, you missed this one but there will be more chances. Moreover - and more importantly - it naturally reduces the amount of people actively hunting for a bottle at any one time. There's got to be a difference between the odds of finding one in a store you frequent at multiple random times in the year than the odds of getting one in a lottery that 500 people went out of their way to show up for on one specific day in the whole year. -John Wendell, Consumer

 

  • As a manager of a small liquor store, it’s even hard for me to get limited bottles. The distributors only cater to the big guys. It would be nice and makes sense to have a lottery or turn based system. I would even say that for customers too. If you want X bottle put your name in the hat. That is a fair way in my opinion. I get the shortage on limited products and only so much can be made and some people will not be able to get it. But with X store always getting the good bottles, it doesn't seems like a level playing field. Also, with it spread out that would give people in areas not around that big store the chance to find rare bottles. -Cecil, Retail Employee

 

  • There isn't a problem! The secondary market and the hunt for limited releases is now part of the culture of this hobby. It's what we talk about with our friends over a dram, it's bragging rights, hell.... it's a reason to drink! Using pricing will move us towards a scotch culture where expensive bottles are actually loathed because of their pompous buyers. Smaller bottles? Please no...that Dickel 17 looks asinine on my shelf. The reality is this culture is fun (albeit subject of controversy and discussion) and is what's allowing our hobby to grow and avoid the "bubble bust.” Driving around the backwoods towns with a bourbon buddy and coming up short is the hobby I choose over one where you have to save up for the expensive bottles you see in every store every time you walk in. When friends are over for a pour, I love telling the stories of how I acquired my rare bottles. I'd rather they respect my efforts and dedication to the hobby than my bank account. -Aaron, Consumer

 

While only a handful of reader comments are featured here, each and every comment was reviewed. For those that have been featured, they have been edited for brevity and clarity.

 

 

Written By nick

 

Reviewed: 03/2017

 

About the writer

Widget is loading comments...